Is GLJ Research a reliable analyst?

In short — Over 1 year, 31.6% of GLJ Research's targets proved profitable, for an average gain of -24.7% per call (all calls, winners and losers) — i.e. -14.8% vs its sector, across 19 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: not very reliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
31.6%profitable calls
-24.7%avg gain / call
-14.8%vs sector
19scored calls

In which sectors is GLJ Research reliable?

SectorCalls % profitable Avg gain 2015+ Avg gain 2020+ Last 12 months
Cons. disc.128.3%-48.9%-48.9%+10.5% (9)

The 25 stocks GLJ Research performed best on

StockCalls % profitable Avg gain 2015+ Avg gain 2020+ Last 12 months
FSLR First Solar580%+22.6%+22.6%-25.8% (2)
TSLA Tesla, Inc.128.3%-48.9%-48.9%+10.5% (9)
% profitable = share of its calls that made money (1 year). Avg gain / call = average absolute gain per call (winners and losers). Point-in-time, S&P 500 backtest.

❓ GLJ Research: frequently asked questions

Is GLJ Research a reliable analyst? How accurate are their price targets?

Over 12 months, 31.6% of GLJ Research's targets were profitable, averaging -24.7% per call (-14.8% vs their sector), across 19 timestamped calls. Verdict: not very reliable on average. We judge on real results, not reputation — the call-by-call detail is further up this page.

JPI AI Analyst AI assistant · JPI Invest
Answers based on the tool’s data · not financial advice · full version (free)