Is MoffettNathanson a reliable analyst?

In short — Over 1 year, 56.1% of MoffettNathanson's targets proved profitable, for an average gain of +17.6% per call (all calls, winners and losers) — i.e. +12.0% vs its sector, across 66 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: fairly reliable. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
56.1%profitable calls
+17.6%avg gain / call
+12.0%vs sector
66scored calls

In which sectors is MoffettNathanson reliable?

SectorCalls % profitable Avg gain 2015+ Avg gain 2020+ Last 12 months
Cons. disc.1369.2%+23.5%+39.9%
Tech1560%+27.0%+25.7%
Comm.2556%+14.0%+20.0%+38.6% (1)

The 25 stocks MoffettNathanson performed best on

StockCalls % profitable Avg gain 2015+ Avg gain 2020+ Last 12 months
CRWD CrowdStrike366.7%+66.7%+66.7%
AMZN Amazon475%+31.2%+31.2%
T AT&T450%+6.3%+7.0%
VZ Verizon366.7%+7.1%+4.2%
% profitable = share of its calls that made money (1 year). Avg gain / call = average absolute gain per call (winners and losers). Point-in-time, S&P 500 backtest.

❓ MoffettNathanson: frequently asked questions

Is MoffettNathanson a reliable analyst? How accurate are their price targets?

Over 12 months, 56.1% of MoffettNathanson's targets were profitable, averaging +17.6% per call (+12.0% vs their sector), across 66 timestamped calls. Verdict: fairly reliable. We judge on real results, not reputation — the call-by-call detail is further up this page.

JPI AI Analyst AI assistant · JPI Invest
Answers based on the tool’s data · not financial advice · full version (free)